Teams

2025 WI Combo 6.5X NEL Ogden McGrath

2025 WI Combo Mixed · WI Combo Mixed 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Galina Petrinska vs Kathy Kelly / Karthick Muthaiyan4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Hale / Kaylee Graefe vs Abbey Grunwald / Brian Anderson6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristine Kenowski / Russell Salzer vs Jack Palasota / Jackie Dumke4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSteve Hale / Valerie Narveson vs Karthick Muthaiyan / Natalie Brandt6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Gina Moon vs Theresa Palasota / Duane Brandt3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Lackey / Mitch Kroll vs Heather Strayer / Brian Anderson4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Kristine Kenowski vs Zachary Brandt / Ann Patteson3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesValerie Narveson / Mitch Kroll vs Luke Follmann / Eve Parker5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen McGrath / Jonathan Paque vs Jackie Dumke / Karthick Muthaiyan6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKaylee Graefe / Steve Hale vs Duane Brandt / Ann Patteson6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRussell Salzer / Gina Moon vs Luke Follmann / Natalie Brandt2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Springmier / Taylor Lackey vs Karthick Muthaiyan / Heather Strayer0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesValerie Narveson / Steve Hale vs Brandon Jonen / Erica Shookman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMitch Kroll / Taylor Lackey vs Tara Sherman / Glen Sherman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaureen McGrath / Russell Salzer vs Katie Oberstadt / David Wiesner4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesValerie Narveson / Ryan Borucki vs Erica Shookman / Brandon Jonen7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRussell Salzer / Gina Moon vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Blaine Springer0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJonathan Paque / Kristine Kenowski vs Katie Oberstadt / Kyle Oberstadt3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesValerie Narveson / Steve Hale vs Glen Sherman / Tara Sherman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTaylor Lackey / Mitch Kroll vs Katie Oberstadt / Kyle Oberstadt6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaylee Graefe / Ryan Borucki vs Brandon Jonen / Erica Shookman3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesChin-Yi Lin / Galina Petrinska vs Chelsea Watry / David Wiesner6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRussell Salzer / Maureen McGrath vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Blaine Springer4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Paque / Gina Moon vs Erica Shookman / Brandon Jonen2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Combo Mixed 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12025 WI Combo 6.5X NEL Western Jonen7119515184
22025 WI Combo 6.5X NEL GBTC Palasota44111327228
32025 WI Combo 6.5X NEL Ogden McGrath1761837254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Valerie Narveson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Kaylee Graefe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Galina Petrinska
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Steve Hale
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.97
Russell Salzer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.95
Chin-Yi Lin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Taylor Lackey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Mitch Kroll
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Jonathan Paque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Scott Springmier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Gina Moon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kristine Kenowski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Borucki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mitch Kroll + Galina Petrinska6067% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Narveson + Steve Hale213 matchesnot enough data
Mitch Kroll + Taylor Lackey123 matchesnot enough data
Galina Petrinska + Steve Hale303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valerie Narveson
23W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Kaylee Graefe
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Galina Petrinska
39W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Steve Hale
44W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Russell Salzer
0W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Chin-Yi Lin
22W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Taylor Lackey
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Mitch Kroll
26W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Jonathan Paque
21W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Scott Springmier
16W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Gina Moon
15W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kristine Kenowski
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Borucki
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.