Teams

Stromberg Smash Squad

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-27vs MacariolaWon 31
W#1 DoublesMeredith Stromberg / Amy Haynes vs KJ Madison / Maureen Wollak6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Ginny Zarras6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Neddermeyer / Lindsay Goodwin vs Maria Cecilia Ray / Wendy Liu6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Marble / Brook Holzinger vs Adona Rabago / Nancy Quinn6-1, 6-4
2025-01-09vs MacariolaWon 32
W#1 DoublesMeredith Stromberg / Brook Holzinger vs Rachel Johnson / Bernadette MacKey6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSharia Carlson vs Corazon Fos7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Madden / Michelle Pelland vs Claudia Chapman / Maureen Wollak2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Galatz vs Lisa Andreasen5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarb Johnson / Sandra Marble vs Maria Annette MacAriola / Nancy Quinn4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Meredith Stromberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Kate Schuenke
published
2.99
Amy Haynes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Brook Holzinger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Rachel Madden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Sharia Carlson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Lindsay Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Michelle Pelland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Yelena Yan
published
2.76
Barb Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Jessica Galatz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.39
Lisa Neddermeyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Marble
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Haynes + Meredith Stromberg14464% games+6.0% vs expected
Meredith Stromberg + Brook Holzinger5252% games+5.1% vs expected
Michelle Pelland + Kate Schuenke5654% games−0.1% vs expected
Barb Johnson + Michelle Pelland224 matchesnot enough data
Barb Johnson + Kate Schuenke314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Goodwin + Lisa Neddermeyer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meredith Stromberg
54W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Kate Schuenke
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Amy Haynes
28W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Brook Holzinger
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Rachel Madden
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Sharia Carlson
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Lindsay Goodwin
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Michelle Pelland
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Barb Johnson
20W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Jessica Galatz
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Lisa Neddermeyer
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Sandra Marble
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.