Teams

40 & Over Extra Women

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Extra Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Extra Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kristin Korotney
published
3.53
3.53
Jenny Alderman
published
3.25
Yuliia McDonald
published
3.23
Marissa Regan
published
3.12
Paula Green
published
3.01
Connie Biggs
published 3.5
2.96
Linda Neill
published
2.92
Staci Houser
published
2.90
2.85
Allison Shira
published 3
2.84
Rose Ann Ferber
published
2.80
Ana Peterson
published 3
2.77
Dee Dee Joyce
published 3
Rona Cushman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Korotney + Janneke Vreede-Schaay5172% games+18.9% vs expected
Yuliia McDonald + Kristin Korotney4352% games−0.6% vs expected
Dee Dee Joyce + Allison Shira111348% games−1.1% vs expected
Dee Dee Joyce + Linda Neill2741% games−7.7% vs expected
Dee Dee Joyce + Kristin Korotney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Korotney
83W–27L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Janneke Vreede-Schaay
76W–34L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jenny Alderman
33W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Yuliia McDonald
56W–42L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Marissa Regan
33W–40L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Paula Green
15W–32L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Connie Biggs
30W–45L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Linda Neill
73W–50L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Staci Houser
19W–52L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3.5
Barbara Breidenbruch
7W–62L career · type A · no lines in 2024
75%25%<1%
2.90
3
Allison Shira
75W–51L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Rose Ann Ferber
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Ana Peterson
17W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Dee Dee Joyce
83W–95L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Rona Cushman
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.