Teams

C5 Dominion Harper

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-05vs C2 MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Drucker / Annmarie Lobred vs Lisa Loudermilk / Beth Morris6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-22vs C7 Hermitage HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Michele Sweeney / Annmarie Lobred vs Heidi Hall / Virginia Berents6-3, 6-3
2021-04-17vs C4 Southampton BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Lobred / Lauren Duke vs Beth Stafford / Alice Ulrichs6-4, 7-5
2021-04-10vs C7 Hermitage HallWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnmarie Lobred / Sandra Crawford vs Kathy Harcum / Lynne Butz1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-04-03vs C3 Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Michele Sweeney / Annmarie Lobred vs Barbara Portanova / Brenda Tyson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Lauren Duke
published
3.75
3.61
Annmarie Lobred
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Melissa MacAleese
published
3.26
Deborah Eldridge
published 3.5
3.23
Sharon Moorefield
published
3.21
Laura Wheeler
published
3.18
Lisa Drucker
published
3.18
Ann Michele Sweeney
published 3.5
3.04
Cathy Parker
published 3
2.90
Dee Navolio
published
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
2.70
Becky Harper
published 3
2.68
Susan Derco
published
2.63
Dodee Smith
published 3
2.58
Sandra Crawford
published
2.56
Elaine McCormick
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa MacAleese + Laura Wheeler314 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Eldridge + Sharon Moorefield213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Duke
16W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Elizabeth Walkley
9W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Annmarie Lobred
155W–109L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
Melissa MacAleese
15W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Deborah Eldridge
16W–19L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Sharon Moorefield
20W–19L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Laura Wheeler
28W–18L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Lisa Drucker
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ann Michele Sweeney
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Cathy Parker
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
3.04
Dee Navolio
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Becky Harper
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Susan Derco
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Dodee Smith
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sandra Crawford
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Elaine McCormick
3W–16L career · no lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.