← Teams

IND-Bogard

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 WOMEN

5 players · average NTRP 4.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Sierra Wright
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Maddie Karpinski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.80
Tiare Farris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.77
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.73
Trish Vawter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
Results3 ties
2021-04-18Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSydney Ihde / MELISSA PISHION BOTTA vs Elise Kang / Mariam Nechiporuk6-0, 6-0
2021-04-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMELISSA PISHION BOTTA / Sydney Ihde vs Gina Ellison / Chrissy Morgan6-4, 7-6
2021-04-17Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSydney Ihde / MELISSA PISHION BOTTA vs Madalyn Williams / Tamara McGregor7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Sierra Wright
80W–69L career
11%89%0%
4.03
4.5
Maddie Karpinski
38W–58L career
54%46%0%
3.85
4.5
Tiare Farris
43W–54L career
65%35%0%
3.80
4.5
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA
16W–58L career
71%29%0%
3.77
4
Trish Vawter
63W–83L career
1%99%0%
3.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.