Teams

MacDonald

2021 Circle D Tennis Club Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-06-15vs CrockerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCintya Leveque / Debra MacDonald vs Sherry Cummings / Mary Jo Roberton5-7, 1-6
2021-06-08vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 02
L#1 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Peggy Koele4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Donna Considine vs Charlene della Ratta / Stephanie Almeida3-6, 3-6
2021-06-01vs Team LimeLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Considine / Kim Neiss vs Stephanie Porta / Traci Spiegel1-6, 1-6
2021-05-25vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelly Levey / Cintya Leveque vs Leanne Glueck / Keri Teodori2-6
L#3 DoublesKim Neiss / Evie Callahan vs Peggy Koele / Tonya Crosley4-6, 0-6
2021-05-13vs CrockerLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Covell / Evie Callahan vs Sanghee Lee / Faustina Smith-Neil2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-05-11vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 02
L#1 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Jessica Gong5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Broadbent / Debra MacDonald vs Carol Campbell / Peggy Koele3-6, 1-6
2021-05-04Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCintya Leveque / Donna Considine vs Catherine Hatfalvi / Catherine Wheeler1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKim Neiss / Kathryn Broadbent vs Connie Benning / Angie Martin0-6, 2-6
2021-04-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Melissa Allnutt7-5, 6-2
2021-04-20vs Callahan/SteinbergLost 02
L#1 SinglesCintya Leveque vs Holly Hoenes4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Evie Callahan vs Peggy Koele / Tonya Crosley0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cara Carino
published 4
3.49
Melissa Covell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Cintya Leveque
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Sherry Chase
published
3.27
3.14
Kim Neiss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Debra MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Joanne Stine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra MacDonald + Cintya Leveque8759% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cara Carino
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Melissa Covell
60W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–233L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
Sherry Chase
14W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Christina Shioutakon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Joanne Stine
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.