Teams

Chen (RTCB)

2023 CVTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Winter '22 · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-01-10vs Powell (RTCB)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargie DeShon / Kimsey Kendrick vs Katie Stout / Christi Cronin6-4, 6-3
2022-12-28vs Cargle (RTCB)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimsey Kendrick / Margie DeShon vs Kimberly Brown / Charlene Mathis6-4, 6-1
2022-12-12vs Cargle (RTCB)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargie DeShon / Stacy Sorrow vs Betty Andersen / Brittany Mize6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-12-06vs Robinson (RTCB)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMargie DeShon / Stacy Sorrow vs Lindsey Langhans / Bethany Nails3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Stacy Sorrow
published
3.67
Jamie Chen
published 4
3.65
Sarah Blasius
published
3.64
Kelly Roberts
published
3.60
Shirley Rutledge
published
3.49
Kimsey Kendrick
published
3.42
Robine Kramer
published
3.40
Lucky Chan
published
Margie DeShon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Minerva Dano
published
Tammy Foubert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Chen + Shirley Rutledge4255% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Chen + Lucky Chan6061% gamesnot enough data
Jamie Chen + Sarah Blasius123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Sorrow
46W–34L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Jamie Chen
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Sarah Blasius
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.65
Kelly Roberts
49W–18L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Shirley Rutledge
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kimsey Kendrick
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Robine Kramer
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.42
Lucky Chan
29W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Minerva Dano
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Foubert
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.