Teams

Eagle Harbor - Rouse

2026 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-20vs ABCC - WolfelWon 31
W#1 DoublesLori Mercer / Daiva Nixon vs Jaime Eaton / Emily Hall7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKerry Clark vs Holly Gallo6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPam Fritz / Deana Jones vs Anne Nichol / Lisa Warfle5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Cornell / Sue Webster vs Julie Russo / Jo Adcock6-2, 6-2
2026-06-14vs Planet Swim - EulenfeldLost 01
L#1 DoublesPam Fritz / Deana Jones vs Tory Eulenfeld / Sarah Merritt4-6, 5-7
2026-05-17vs Duval/CordellWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnne Kugler / Sue Webster vs Elizabeth McKillop / Jamie Lewis6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTheresa Cumpstone vs Kara Bosworth2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKelly Glavin / Christy Surgeoner vs Jennifer Ream / Kia Linebaugh6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesErica Washkill vs Brieanna Blaylock2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Mercer / Patricia Linge vs Vanya Robinson / Nelda Guerra-Smith3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-10vs Sawgrass - ConlinWon 10
W#2 DoublesPam Fritz / Deana Jones vs Caroline Eddings / Sara Margeson6-0, 6-0
2026-05-03vs FYC - MartenLost 23
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rouse / Kelly Glavin vs Jessica Morgan Martens / Lauren Griffith3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTheresa Cumpstone vs Ashli Nixon5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDeana Jones / Pam Fritz vs Monica Hentschel / Victoria Beerman5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDaiva Nixon vs Tara Volpe3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErica Washkill / Sita Shah vs Jordan Rechcigl / Sara Bertoch4-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs Palencia - KrocLost 23
L#1 DoublesDaiva Nixon / Stephanie Rouse vs Valerie Dolan / Tracy Smith1-6, 2-2
L#1 SinglesTheresa Cumpstone vs Krista Kroc2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Mercer / Sue Webster vs Lorraine Turcotte / Sarah Denson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKerry Clark vs Lauren Domitz6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPam Fritz / Maria Broyles vs Jennifer Erwin / Shannon Regil6-1, 6-4
2026-04-12vs Planet Swim - EulenfeldLost 01
L#3 DoublesBeth Jansen / Sarah Cornell vs Brooke Tsao / Cristina Winkler6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Maria Broyles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Pam Fritz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Sue Webster
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Kelly Glavin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Daiva Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.91
Deana Jones
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Lori Mercer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Patricia Linge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Stephanie Rouse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Kugler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christy Surgeoner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Erica Washkill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.70
Sarah Cornell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Lori Gunn
published
2.66
Sita Shah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Theresa Cumpstone
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Beth Jansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kerry Clark
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Rouse + Kelly Glavin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Broyles
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Pam Fritz
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Sue Webster
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Kelly Glavin
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Daiva Nixon
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Deana Jones
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lori Mercer
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
2.86
Patricia Linge
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Stephanie Rouse
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Anne Kugler
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Christy Surgeoner
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Erica Washkill
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Sarah Cornell
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Lori Gunn
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Sita Shah
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Theresa Cumpstone
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Beth Jansen
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Kerry Clark
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.