Teams

SCOTT VALLEY CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-27vs PIONEER PK CW6.5AWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Masters / Ashley Block Rutberg vs Lisa Lundy / Dana Gray6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlexis Gulash / Stacey Silver vs Sandy Geller / Florence Pattison6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Cohen / Maria Hermanussen vs Amanda Mccarthy / Bernadette McCarthy6-4, 6-4
2025-08-26vs GLTF/GOLDMAN TC CW6.5BWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Pomerantz / Deborah Sohn vs Divya Bhat / Jessica Pfannenstiel6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Ashley MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Alexis Gulash
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kerry Barlas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Kimberly Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Terri Reed
published
3.14
Lisa Taft
published
3.07
Jennifer Hymes
published
3.02
Ashley Block Rutberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Carrie Pomerantz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Amy Lowery
published 3
2.92
Stacey Silver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Jenni Zaidi
published
2.85
Anna Kovinsky
published 3
2.83
Ellen Taylor
published
2.82
Amy Moffet
published 3
2.69
Maria Hermanussen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Vivian Wohl
published
2.66
Johanna Calabria
published
2.45
Tricia Johnston
published
2.36
Deena Wardimon
published 2.5
2.34
Chelsea de St. Paer
published 2.5
2.18
Joan Tong
published
Lorna Rushforth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexis Gulash + Ashley MacDonald5161% games+8.5% vs expected
Amy Moffet + Amy Lowery5159% games+1.7% vs expected
Alexis Gulash + Kerry Barlas4348% games+0.0% vs expected
Kimberly Hobson + Ashley MacDonald4948% games−3.0% vs expected
Deena Wardimon + Chelsea de St. Paer134 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Pomerantz + Jenni Zaidi213 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Barlas + Ashley MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley MacDonald
31W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Alexis Gulash
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Kerry Barlas
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Kimberly Hobson
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Terri Reed
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Lisa Taft
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Jennifer Hymes
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Ashley Block Rutberg
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Carrie Pomerantz
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.02
3
Amy Lowery
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Stacey Silver
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jenni Zaidi
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Anna Kovinsky
6W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Ellen Taylor
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.83
3
Amy Moffet
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Maria Hermanussen
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Vivian Wohl
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Johanna Calabria
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Tricia Johnston
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Deena Wardimon
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Chelsea de St. Paer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
Joan Tong
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Lorna Rushforth
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.