Teams

Bowles Team

2025 USTA Adult 55&Over League - Abilene · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-06vs Stewart TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesRose Bristow / Lana Bland vs Karen Wilkins / Laura Evans2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeanne Scott / Susan Bowles vs Rhonda Hatchett / Melissa Patterson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEllen Massey / Linda Ueckert vs Judy Voelter / Sherry Stewart6-3, 6-2
2025-04-05vs Stewart TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Ueckert / Susan Bowles vs Sherry Stewart / Laura Evans6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeanne Scott / Lana Bland vs Karen Wilkins / Melissa Patterson7-5, 6-2
2025-03-29vs Stewart TeamWon 21
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wilson / Rose Bristow vs Cheryl Wolverton / Rhonda Hatchett6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLana Bland / Barbara Starnes vs Laura Evans / Judy Voelter6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeanne Scott / Ellen Massey vs Sherry Stewart / Karen Wilkins6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-28vs Stewart TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesRose Bristow / Catherine Wilson vs Denise Connolly / Cheryl Wolverton6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Starnes / Susan Bowles vs Laura Evans / Melissa Patterson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLeanne Scott / Ellen Massey vs Karen Wilkins / Judy Voelter7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Barbara Starnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Kelly Pointer
published
3.58
Rose Bristow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Lana Bland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Susan Bowles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Linda Ueckert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ellen Massey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leanne Scott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Pointer + Linda Ueckert2438% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Starnes
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Pointer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Rose Bristow
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Lana Bland
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Susan Bowles
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Linda Ueckert
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Ellen Massey
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leanne Scott
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.