Teams

LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 40AW2.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 2.5

4 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kelso / Michelle Watkins vs Allison Battistelli / Krista Parker5-7, 6-7
2022-03-05vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW2.5+ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Leilani Bell / Michelle Watkins vs Jackie Vincent / Susan Kung4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Askins / Michelle Watkins vs Cara Mia Barnacascel / Mary Soe0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-02-14vs MORAGA CC 40AW2.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesMichelle Watkins vs Ria Nickens0-6, 0-6
2022-02-13vs ROUND HILL CC 40AW2.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMay Lee / Michelle Watkins vs Janet Sconza Angers / Christy Watson0-6, 3-6
2022-02-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGerri Asuncion / Michelle Watkins vs Allison Battistelli / Cindy Knapp1-6, 3-6
2022-01-30vs CLAREMONT R and S 40AW2.5+ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJackie Cummings / Michelle Watkins vs Suzanne Koga / Jennifer Hedrick6-7, 3-6
2022-01-16vs MORAGA CC 40AW2.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMay Lee / Michelle Watkins vs Ria Nickens / Stephanie Sinclitico4-6, 0-6
2022-01-08vs ROUND HILL CC 40AW2.5ALost 01
L#1 SinglesMichelle Watkins vs Heather Paquette0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Julie Askins
published
Michelle Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.22
May Lee
published
1.85
Anita Roth
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Askins
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Michelle Watkins
50W–38L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
May Lee
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Anita Roth
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.