Teams

Hagen/Gilchrist 7.0 18+MX W23

2023 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 7.0 Mx

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-19vs Steiniger 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Zachary Smith vs Erin Blacik / John Moen7-6, 6-4
2023-03-05vs Edwardson 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Zachary Smith vs Madeline Dubelier / Daniel Edwardson6-4, 6-3
2023-02-26vs Yurchak 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#1 DoublesJJ Parker / Tina Mcalpine vs Timothy Finnerty / Marnie Brown Cress6-0, 6-4
2023-02-05vs Kruse- 1-2 Punch 7.0 18+MX W23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTina Mcalpine / Chris McAlpine vs Richard Weinberg / Katelyn Zurn4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTina Mcalpine / JJ Parker vs Virginia Kuberski / Patrick Ledray6-1, 6-3
2023-01-08vs Edwardson 7.0 18+MX W23Won 10
W#2 DoublesTina Mcalpine / JJ Parker vs Lauren Smith-Kiewel / Ryan Wolff6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mx have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Anne Cammack
published 4
3.70
Tina Mcalpine
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Christine Leach
published 4
3.58
Michelle Buron
published
3.30
Chris McAlpine
published 3.5
3.19
Ann Gabrielli
published 3.5
3.19
Ann Shronts
published 3.5
2.78
Brian Hagen
published 3
JJ Parker
published
Sally Gilchrist
published
Trey Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Gabrielli + Trey Thompson6451% gamesnot enough data
Brian Hagen + Tina Mcalpine2447% gamesnot enough data
Sally Gilchrist + JJ Parker404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Buron + JJ Parker213 matchesnot enough data
Christine Leach + Brian Hagen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Cammack
28W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Tina Mcalpine
95W–72L career · 9 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christine Leach
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Michelle Buron
23W–22L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Chris McAlpine
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Ann Gabrielli
24W–22L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ann Shronts
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Brian Hagen
7W–8L career · type M · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
JJ Parker
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Gilchrist
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trey Thompson
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.