Teams

HOLBROOK PK 18AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.5

21 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Michaela Zuckova
published
4.43
Janise Taylor
published
4.33
Kellie Taylor
published
4.26
Irene Otten
published
4.26
Marianne Dundon
published
4.25
Ellie Victor
published
4.23
Lisa Steinback
published
4.23
Mia Banks
published
4.23
Andrea Barnes
published 4.5
4.22
Paula Moser
published
4.22
Carrie Friedberg
published 4.5
4.20
Pratima Rao
published
4.19
Kristine Avila
published
4.18
Zeynep Chasseray
published
4.15
Alicia van Fleteren
published 4.5
4.14
Liza Geary
published
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
published
4.08
Harriet Ragozin
published
4.05
Suzanne Jochner
published
4.02
Elani Phan
published
Jane Solomon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pratima Rao + Irene Otten213 matchesnot enough data
Alicia van Fleteren + Sumeeta Vasishta303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michaela Zuckova
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.47
Janise Taylor
8W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
Kellie Taylor
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Irene Otten
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
Marianne Dundon
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Ellie Victor
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.25
Lisa Steinback
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Mia Banks
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Andrea Barnes
12W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Paula Moser
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Carrie Friedberg
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Pratima Rao
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.20
Kristine Avila
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Zeynep Chasseray
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alicia van Fleteren
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
4.15
Liza Geary
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
Sumeeta Vasishta
24W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
4.14
Harriet Ragozin
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Suzanne Jochner
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Elani Phan
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jane Solomon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.