Teams

WI Low Tri W Summer Singles MALT Wegner

2026 WI Other · WI Low Tri Summer Singles Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05Lost 01
L#3 SinglesEunji Oh vs Anna Krylova1-6, 3-6
2026-08-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesEunji Oh vs Amy Frederick7-5, 6-1
2026-07-22Won 20
W#1 SinglesEunji Oh vs Anna Krylova6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLauren Lindley vs Xiaobin Zhou6-2, 6-1
2026-07-20Won 10
W#1 SinglesEunji Oh vs Amy Bishop6-1, 6-2
2026-06-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Lindley vs Haiyan Zhou6-1, 6-2
2026-05-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Lindley vs Yana Mavlyutov6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Low Tri Summer Singles Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Low Tri W Summer Singles MALT Mavlyutov5315920176
2WI Low Tri W Summer Singles MALT Wegner44111329221
3WI Low Tri W Summer Singles MALT Bishop35101432239

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Deb Parman
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.57
Lauren Lindley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Joy Gander
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.25
Holly Wegner
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.15
Eunji Oh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.03
Gwen Finnegan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Karelyn Hopkins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deb Parman
22W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
3.5
Lauren Lindley
122W–102L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Joy Gander
68W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Holly Wegner
62W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Eunji Oh
41W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Gwen Finnegan
17W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Karelyn Hopkins
178W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.