Teams

Melis - Lobsters

2025 Loudoun Combo · Loudoun Combo 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-16vs Colan - Smash BrosWon 20
W#1 DoublesGreg Merritt / Santhosh Potti vs Marley Green / Peter Winants6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharlie Haake / Scott Johnson vs Ankit Patel / Anthony Preston7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-11-13vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSanthosh Potti / Matthew Trimboli vs Gene Chun / Frank Pan6-3, 6-3
2025-11-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Trimboli / Charlie Haake vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-06vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Trimboli / Santhosh Potti vs Jesse Cebulash / Prashant Padmashali1-6, 3-6
2025-11-02vs Klinge/Tiong - Team CourtmastersWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Trimboli / Santhosh Potti vs Bryan Daguiar / Samyak Kathane6-1, 6-4
2025-10-26vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Haake / Santhosh Potti vs Frank Pan / David Teale6-2, 6-1
2025-10-18vs Colan - Smash BrosWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlie Haake / Santhosh Potti vs Gabriel Galvan / Chris Single6-0, 6-1
2025-10-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Haake / Santhosh Potti vs Charlie Flam / David Leudemann6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Combo 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Santhosh Potti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
3.20
Adam Briggs
published 3.5
3.14
Matthew Trimboli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.03
Justin Garza
published
2.83
Charlie Haake
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
David Register
published 3
2.82
John Cummins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Trimboli + Santhosh Potti314 matchesnot enough data
Charlie Haake + Matthew Trimboli213 matchesnot enough data
Charlie Haake + Santhosh Potti303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Santhosh Potti
41W–20L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
SARATHCHANDRA SOMAYAJULA
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Adam Briggs
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3
Matthew Trimboli
119W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Justin Garza
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Charlie Haake
28W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
David Register
9W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
John Cummins
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.