Teams

RVC:OverTheHill:Romond:Colvin

2024 NH Adult 65 & Over Men · 8.0 Men 1

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-27vs BB:Cistulli:SiegelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBradford Brainard / Joe Meyer vs Philip Cistulli / Larry Barnes6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrank Babbott / William Romond vs Robert Bondaruk / Ronald Lafond3-6, 1-6
2024-07-13vs MTS:KingWon 21
W#1 DoublesBradford Brainard / James Grossman vs William Pontious / Robert Zeller6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFrank Babbott / William Romond vs Richard King / Jon Judge7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Hunt / Steven Arms vs Tom Nieva / David Foster1-6, 1-6
2024-06-15vs MTS:KingWon 20
W#1 DoublesNixon de Tarnowsky / James Grossman vs Richard King / Tom Nieva6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesFrank Babbott / Joe Meyer vs Rick Hines / William Pontious3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-01vs BB:Cistulli:SiegelLost 12
W#1 DoublesBradford Brainard / Nixon de Tarnowsky vs Robert Bondaruk / Philip Cistulli7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristopher Bakriges / Joe Meyer vs Larry Barnes / Jeffrey Siegel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteven Arms / James Grossman vs Ronald Lafond / Bruce Leibig6-0, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Bakriges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Frank Babbott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
James Grossman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.00
Russ Colvin
published
Joe Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
John Hunt
published
Nixon de Tarnowsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Arms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Romond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hunt + Russ Colvin1441% gamesnot enough data
James Grossman + Nixon de Tarnowsky404 matchesnot enough data
James Grossman + Steven Arms123 matchesnot enough data
William Romond + Steven Arms303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Bakriges
10W–14L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Frank Babbott
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
James Grossman
13W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Russ Colvin
15W–34L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
Joe Meyer
23W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Hunt
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nixon de Tarnowsky
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Arms
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Romond
22W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.