Teams

SONTERRA SELECT

2025 40 & OVER WEEKEND WOMEN · 3.0 Women Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Erika Moe
published 3.5
3.11
Tanya Power
published
3.09
Kim Bergeron
published
2.92
Mariana Reynoso
published
2.89
Jane Mathis
published
2.87
Emily Galvan
published 3
2.86
Jessica Ison
published
2.85
Shelly Dickson
published
2.85
Nora Espinoza
published
2.84
Margarita Kirk
published
2.79
Esther Paddock
published 3
2.79
Michelle Gonzalez
published
Elsa Ang
published 3
2.73
Marisol Acevedo
published
2.40
Courtney Connolly
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Ison + Tanya Power224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bergeron + Nora Espinoza213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bergeron + Tanya Power303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Moe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Tanya Power
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Kim Bergeron
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
Mariana Reynoso
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jane Mathis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Emily Galvan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Jessica Ison
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
2.86
Shelly Dickson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Nora Espinoza
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Margarita Kirk
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Esther Paddock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Michelle Gonzalez
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Elsa Ang
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisol Acevedo
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Courtney Connolly
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.