Teams

KY/LOU/ACKERMANN

2026 USTA COMBO 18 & OVER LOUISVILLE · 8.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.30 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 11:00 AM
vs N/A
Aimee Ackermann
Sep 19 12:00 PM
Blairwood Tennis Swim & Fitness Club
Sep 27 12:00 PM
Plainview Tennis Center
Oct 3 11:00 AM
vs N/A
Aimee Ackermann
2026-08-29vs KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSONLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Raby / Kimberly Morton vs Whitney Thomas / Emily Schmidt5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Schreiber / Denise Roby vs Abby Schuhmann / Katherine Willis2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLivia Aftenie / Stacey Rice vs Maureen Fulton / Shaheen Khan6-7, 4-6
2026-08-15vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Raby / Jill Roby vs Sara DeSanctis / Kristin Weirich6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJody Shaikun / Erica Rust vs Rebecca McClellan / Sandra McCaffrey6-4, 4-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Gulledge / Heather Long vs Tracey Risk / Casey Vidal6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-07vs KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaelin Roberts / Sarah Kane-Liu vs Whitney CollinsThompson / Shaheen Khan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Schreiber / Kathleen Berghausen vs Whitney Thomas / Amanda Maddox2-6, 4-6
2026-07-24vs KY/LOU/HOSTETLERWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaelin Roberts / Erica Rust vs Sara DeSanctis / Rebecca McClellan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Gulledge / Nina Scott vs Susan Witten / Tracey Risk3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLivia Aftenie / Heather Long vs Mary Grace Amato / Sandra McCaffrey6-2, 7-6
2026-07-19vs KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSONLost 03
L#1 DoublesJody Shaikun / Erica Rust vs Lynn Thompson / Emily Schmidt4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara Moore / Sarah Kane-Liu vs Kim Cox / Katherine Willis7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRose Shuck / Kathleen Berghausen vs Whitney Thomas / Cammie O'Connell2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSON3090256
2KY/LOU/ACKERMANN225717129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Kaelin Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Marnie Ochoa
published
4.18
Jill Roby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Amy Gulledge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Livia Aftenie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Carmen Schreiber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Aimee Ackermann
published 4.5
4.00
Karen Raby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Sarah Kane-Liu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Erica Rust
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Jody Shaikun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Kathleen Berghausen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Kimberly Morton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Rose Shuck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Nina Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Kristin Kasimati
published
3.69
Denise Roby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Roby + Kimberly Morton4261% games+5.9% vs expected
Livia Aftenie + Jody Shaikun4258% gamesnot enough data
Rose Shuck + Karen Raby2350% gamesnot enough data
Jill Roby + Karen Raby404 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Ackermann + Amy Gulledge314 matchesnot enough data
Jody Shaikun + Erica Rust134 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Kane-Liu + Kathleen Berghausen303 matchesnot enough data
Livia Aftenie + Rose Shuck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaelin Roberts
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.38
Marnie Ochoa
31W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.30
Jill Roby
73W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.18
4.5
Amy Gulledge
34W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
Livia Aftenie
66W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Carmen Schreiber
52W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Aimee Ackermann
22W–26L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
Karen Raby
54W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
Sarah Kane-Liu
86W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Erica Rust
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
Jody Shaikun
48W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.82
Kathleen Berghausen
39W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Kimberly Morton
25W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Rose Shuck
24W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
2%95%3%
3.76
Nina Scott
26W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Kristin Kasimati
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Denise Roby
29W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.