Teams

KBTA (Arizmendy)

2026 MIAMIDADE Social South Florida Women's Double Tennis L · B-1

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-28vs Kendalltown (Ingela)Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesSylvia Langlois / Ria Jones vs Adriana Lima / Meredith Wasserman6-1, 6-3
2026-03-10vs Coral Oaks (Fabry)Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesCarolina Backes / Sylvia Langlois vs Karen Cohen / Stephanie Voell5-7, 4-6
2026-02-24Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesCarolina Backes / Sylvia Langlois vs Paula Ganter Herron / Janet Jupiter6-3, 6-1
2026-01-27vs Coral Reef Park (Picard)Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesCarolina Backes / Sylvia Langlois vs Veronica Matzner / Beth Lang6-2, 6-0
2026-01-20vs Kendalltown (Ingela)Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesMilagros del Rosario / Sylvia Langlois vs Gabriela Mendoza / Daniela Garcia6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-18vs Dante Fascell (Thayer)Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesRenee Potts / Sylvia Langlois vs Liliana Salmon / Adela Tichacek3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · B-1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KBTA (Arizmendy)120512149454
2Coral Oaks (Fabry)93452767626
3Deering Bay (Porter)84363683661
4Kendalltown (Ingela)66452767574
5Dante Fascell (Thayer)57274598705
6Coral Reef Park (Picard)210304294716
7Royal Palm (Jupiter)0121854114768

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Carolina Backes
published 3.5
3.12
Lauren Hegyi
published
3.08
Gisell Stella
published
2.96
2.92
Sylvia Langlois
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Maria Salas
published
2.74
Maria Carrero
published
2.68
Angelika Amat
published 3
2.67
IRMA CAMARENA
published
2.66
Rosemarie Sterling
published
2.56
Victoria Thornhill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

IRMA CAMARENA + Maria Carrero224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolina Backes
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Lauren Hegyi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Gisell Stella
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.08
Milagros del Rosario
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Sylvia Langlois
25W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
2.92
Maria Salas
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Maria Carrero
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Angelika Amat
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
IRMA CAMARENA
3W–13L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Rosemarie Sterling
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Victoria Thornhill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.