Teams

Puma's 3.5

2022 40&Over Men · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-10vs SchlottnerLost 13
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Denney / Peter Campito Sr vs Rick Evans / Gerard McGrinder7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMark van Leuven vs Peter Mesh3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Casagrande / Arlen Johnson vs Douglas Doherty / IMRAN SHAH2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Haggerty / Karthikeyan Panneerselvam vs Tom Dunn / Dale van Buren2-6, 4-6
2022-03-05vs IeronimoWon 31
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Denney / Mark van Leuven vs Tom Fashouer / Luigi Ieronimo6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAllen Goodman vs Ronald Gill6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesArlen Johnson / Richard Casagrande vs Joe Flis / Shawn Haarer1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Haggerty / Christopher Frances vs John Powell / Christopher Gorka6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-27vs Northern: ChinLost 04
L#1 DoublesMark van Leuven / Jan Metzger vs Min-Ho Lee / Joe Connell4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAllen Goodman vs Paul Mushlit3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Haggerty / Peter Campito Sr vs James Galliher / Joung Kim1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Casagrande / Karthikeyan Panneerselvam vs Andy Sink / John Savastio4-6, 1-6
2022-02-20vs SchlottnerWon 31
L#1 DoublesPeter Campito Sr / Jan Metzger vs Douglas Doherty / Gerard McGrinder6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAllen Goodman vs Richard Becker6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Hauber / Mark van Leuven vs Tom Dunn / Dale van Buren7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Denney / Christopher Frances vs Bruce McBride / Steve Wold6-2, 6-2
2022-02-13vs IeronimoWon 31
L#1 DoublesPeter Campito Sr / Jan Metzger vs Tom Fashouer / Luigi Ieronimo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMark van Leuven vs Ronald Gill3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllen Goodman / Christopher Frances vs Christopher Gorka / John Powell6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Hauber / Karthikeyan Panneerselvam vs Joe Flis / Shawn Haarer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-30vs Northern: ChinLost 13
L#1 DoublesJan Metzger / Peter Campito Sr vs James Galliher / Muhsin Celik3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAllen Goodman vs Paul Mushlit3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark van Leuven / Jeffrey Denney vs Kenneth Shea / Joe Connell6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Hauber / Christopher Frances vs Aaron Sinnott / Eric Nickerson4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schlottner0591126201
2Ieronimo0531736225
3Northern: Chin062138165
4Puma's 3.506111331226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mark van Leuven
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.46
Jeffrey Denney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Arlen Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Peter Campito Sr
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Jan Metzger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Allen Goodman
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
David Hauber
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christopher Frances
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kevin Haggerty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Casagrande
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Gadomski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Denney + Mark van Leuven17557% games+1.4% vs expected
Arlen Johnson + David Hauber3447% games−1.4% vs expected
Jan Metzger + Peter Campito Sr4846% games−2.2% vs expected
Christopher Frances + David Hauber2548% games−8.0% vs expected
Arlen Johnson + Richard Casagrande0836% games−8.2% vs expected
Richard Casagrande + Peter Campito Sr2645% gamesnot enough data
Jan Metzger + Allen Goodman3451% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Denney + Peter Campito Sr2442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mark van Leuven
104W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Jeffrey Denney
111W–87L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Arlen Johnson
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Peter Campito Sr
78W–95L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jan Metzger
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Allen Goodman
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
David Hauber
17W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Christopher Frances
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Haggerty
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Casagrande
16W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Gadomski
10W–35L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.