Teams

Gossage 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesPam Ferrell / Jaime Hendricks vs Betsey Wells / Betty Smith2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJacquelyn Larsen / Lourdes Elder vs Ann Zuraw / Susan Kelly1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPat Gossage / Betsy Clapp vs Patty Dutton / Katy Vuncannon6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-26vs Collins 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Elium / Maria Mandaleris vs Suzanne Perez / Page Kreager0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacquelyn Larsen / Jennie Gingher vs Lynette Paley / Gracia Tilley3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTeresa Dail / Susan Abels vs Britt Molitoris / Beth Carter2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-19vs BERRETH 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeresa Dail / Maria Mandaleris vs Krisla Berreth / Katie Bir1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLourdes Elder / Gina Kinard vs Lee Farley / Jan Whittaker3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPat Gossage / Debra Elium vs Dana Marpoe / Marianne Moore2-6, 1-6
2025-09-12vs Michaels 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda MacFadden / Pam Ferrell vs Wanda Davis / Nancy Michaels7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJacquelyn Larsen / Susan Abels vs Katharina Welborn / Sherri Frazier4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Brady-Siler / Jennie Gingher vs Teresa Cruz / Shannon Hughes1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Elium / Maria Mandaleris vs Debbie Clancy / Melanie Burns0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJaime Hendricks / Pam Ferrell vs Christina Schulenklopper / Donna Davis4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTeresa Dail / Lourdes Elder vs Elizabeth Deterding / Patricia Barman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGina Kinard / Pat Gossage vs Ann Zuraw / Lori Partagas3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPam Ferrell / Susan Abels vs Michelle Harris / Faye Halvorsen3-6, 1-6
2025-08-15vs Collins 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Clapp / Susan Abels vs Lynette Paley / Page Kreager5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Elium / Jennie Gingher vs Sherry Gibson / Beth Carter5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda MacFadden / Mechelle Lindenberg vs Britt Molitoris / Suzanne Andia3-6, 1-6
2025-08-01vs Michaels 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AMLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Kinard / Pam Ferrell vs Katharina Welborn / Gayle Taylordean4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMaria Mandaleris / Susan Abels vs Deborah Elston / Sherri Frazier6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPat Gossage / Mechelle Lindenberg vs Wanda Davis / Nancy Michaels4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Betsy Clapp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Teresa Dail
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Gina Kinard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Maria Mandaleris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Jacquelyn Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Pam Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Brenda MacFadden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Mechelle Lindenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Elium
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.49
Lourdes Elder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jennie Gingher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Brady-Siler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pat Gossage
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Abels
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Hendricks + Gina Kinard033 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Hendricks + Pam Ferrell033 matchesnot enough data
Gina Kinard + Pam Ferrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betsy Clapp
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Dail
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jaime Hendricks
12W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Gina Kinard
6W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Maria Mandaleris
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Jacquelyn Larsen
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Pam Ferrell
2W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Brenda MacFadden
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Mechelle Lindenberg
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Debra Elium
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lourdes Elder
6W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jennie Gingher
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Brady-Siler
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pat Gossage
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Abels
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.