Teams

Willow Oaks Blackwood

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-24vs WW Thunderstruck - MullahySplit 11
W#2 DoublesTerence Blackwood / James Dunton vs Jacob Dyer / Jeff Hause2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGreg Loomis / Alex Burnett vs Chris Gerecke / Carter Berry3-6, 2-6
2025-08-09vs Prestige Worldwide - DanielWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnthony Cargill / Greg Loomis vs Kevin Reichert / Michael Larkum6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJuan Loza / Terence Blackwood vs Jamie Kane / Ward Hackett3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Port / Alex Burnett vs Carter Hayes / Elliott Gravitt0-6, 3-6
2025-07-30vs Miracles - MarksLost 03
L#1 DoublesChad Anderson / Sam Gray vs Christopher Quirk / Yalier Fuster3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJuan Loza / James Rosenstock vs Ross Overstreet / Fahim Rahman3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTerence Blackwood / Anthony Cargill vs Christopher Kochensparger / Chris Pecci2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Anthony Cargill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
James Dunton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Sam Gray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Juan Loza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
James Rosenstock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Greg Loomis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Terence Blackwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
David Aschheim
published 3.5
3.30
Steve Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
John Port
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Alex Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Rosenstock + Anthony Cargill3247% games+7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Cargill
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
James Dunton
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Sam Gray
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Juan Loza
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
James Rosenstock
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Greg Loomis
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Terence Blackwood
22W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
David Aschheim
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Steve Campbell
15W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
John Port
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Alex Burnett
35W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.