Teams

Kohler/LR/Reb

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-19vs Lee/LR/RebLost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Hickey / Lisa Chang vs Allyson Hendrix / Jemi Hall6-7, 2-2
2023-04-11vs McDuffie/Beavers/RebLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Sue Rowland vs Toni McDuffie / Carol Harris2-6, 6-4
2023-03-07vs Meek/Conway/BPWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarilynn Nabholz / Lisa Chang vs Kelly Snook / Donna Alford3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Melissa Kohler
published
3.30
Joy Liaw
published
3.28
Marilynn Nabholz
published
Anne Hawkins
published 3.5
3.21
Jill Frazier
published
3.13
Kate Hickey
published
3.13
Kathy Henson
published
3.10
Lisa Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Sue Rowland
published
2.90
Katherine Friend
published
2.79
Linda Pearce
published
2.66
Crystal Phelps
published 3
Oksana Redko
published
Patti Wilkerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Pearce + Melissa Kohler6456% games+6.4% vs expected
Marilynn Nabholz + Lisa Chang224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Kohler
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Joy Liaw
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Marilynn Nabholz
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anne Hawkins
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Frazier
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Kate Hickey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kathy Henson
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lisa Chang
101W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
Sue Rowland
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Katherine Friend
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
Linda Pearce
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Crystal Phelps
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.66
Oksana Redko
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patti Wilkerson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.