Teams

Leeton_Misleh_4.0

2022 Flex Summer Singles · 4.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings27 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Urbas6060014
2Miller - Flexible5151238
3Team Quokka404008
4Van-tastic3030122
5Reynolds(daytime)3131227
6Bursiek (Daytime Only)2121218
7McKay2121328
8Eng2222426
9Shelley Chapman (Flexible)2222531
10Gallinatti- prefer daytime2323854
11Iyer2424853
12IgA1111217
13Hostetler1111323
14Arazy1212428
15NHill Bellevue1212430
16Pritchard (daytime)1313636
17Leeton_Misleh_4.0000000
18Pryde000000
19Koehler000000
20Genevieve Morton000000
21Holly Ng000000
22Hanh Pham000000
23Seatown Sparkles0101212
24wickham0101211
25Torrealba 40101212
26Ryan0202421
27Weiss- DAYTIME0404847

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Emily Misleh
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Misleh
98W–44L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.