Teams

SD University City RC/ Kellie

2023 Adult 40 & Over Capstone League · Capstone Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-05vs SDNC Brengle Terrace/ KristieWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Doolittle / Rainy Miller vs Kristie Alva / Beth Sauer6-3, 6-3
2023-03-18vs SD La Jolla Beach and Tennis/ LuciaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShelley Goodson / Yoke Tanko vs Jennifer Rens / Colleen Royal1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJodi Doolittle / Rainy Miller vs Tiffany Kellogg / Allison Sterett2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-05vs SDNC Brengle Terrace/ KristieSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTina Giubilato / Rainy Miller vs Lisa Crisafulli / Julie Watts0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesYoke Tanko / Jodi Doolittle vs Brenda Barnett / Caron Schraeder6-4, 6-4
2023-03-04vs SDNC Brengle Terrace/ KristieLost 01
L#1 DoublesYoke Tanko / Maria Nunez vs Sanem Ahearn / Brenda Barnett2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJodi Doolittle / Rainy Miller vs Una Davis / Jacqueline Rich3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesAurelie Udall / Rainy Miller vs Jennifer Rens / Millie Yablonicky6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Capstone Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darice Carnaje
published 5
Rainy Miller
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 5
Yoke Tanko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.57
Brittany Swenson
published 5
4.37
Kellie Jaquez
published 4.5
4.34
Tina Giubilato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Valerie Tan
published
4.29
Shelley Goodson
published
Karyn McCartney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelley Goodson + Tina Giubilato3352% games−10.1% vs expected
Tina Giubilato + Kellie Jaquez10556% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Darice Carnaje
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Rainy Miller
44W–28L career · type S · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Yoke Tanko
27W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Brittany Swenson
80W–39L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.57
4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Tina Giubilato
72W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
1%86%13%
4.34
Valerie Tan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.31
Shelley Goodson
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Karyn McCartney
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.