Teams

Thomas/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPAR

2025 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Women · 4.0 Ruston (18&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-27vs Fendley/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesTish Jowers / Tabitha Nankya vs Kelly Hammett / DeEtte Wick6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatie Cracraft vs Clara Cobb1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia Dickerson / Kennedi Darr vs Lee Ainsworth / Penny Humphries6-2, 6-3
2025-04-13vs Fendley/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarcia Dickerson / Kennedi Darr vs Lee Ainsworth / Kelly Hammett6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatie Cracraft vs Mary Fendley6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChloe Batterton / Lauryn Brooks vs April Easley / DeEtte Wick6-1, 6-4
2025-04-09vs Fendley/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARLost 13
W#1 DoublesKennedi Darr / Ashton Thomas vs Penny Humphries / Lee Ainsworth6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAngie Saldana vs Clara Cobb4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTish Jowers / Katie Cracraft vs Kelly Hammett / April Easley5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMarcia Dickerson vs Mary Fendley1-6, 0-6
2025-04-06vs Fendley/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 40
W#1 DoublesAngie Saldana / Kennedi Darr vs Penny Humphries / Mary Fendley6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChloe Batterton vs Clara Cobb6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAshton Thomas / Katie Cracraft vs April Easley / DeEtte Wick6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMarcia Dickerson vs Kelly Hammett6-4, 6-2
2025-03-30vs Fendley/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 31
W#1 DoublesKennedi Darr / Katie Cracraft vs April Easley / DeEtte Wick6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarcia Dickerson vs Clara Cobb2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTabitha Nankya / Lauryn Brooks vs Kelly Hammett / Penny Humphries6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAngie Saldana vs Mary Fendley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Ruston (18&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Thomas/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPAR4117817159
2Fendley/4.0/18&O/Ruston/RPAR1481736240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Chloe Batterton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Angie Saldana
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Katie Cracraft
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Kennedi Darr
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lauryn Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marcia Dickerson
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Tabitha Nankya
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tish Jowers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chloe Batterton
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Angie Saldana
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Cracraft
9W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Kennedi Darr
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauryn Brooks
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Dickerson
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tabitha Nankya
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tish Jowers
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.