Teams

PC-Crash-n-Smash

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-12vs PC-Love is For LosersWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlisha Nguyen / Trevor Morrison vs Bryce Richardson / Maria Uy6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesArjun Shanker / Emma Stucki vs Chad Dawson / Erica Clontz3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Cunnington / Roman Gavino vs Ken Holle / Dana Holle6-4, 7-5
2024-10-12vs Park Fit-All Mixed UpWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrevor Morrison / Alisha Nguyen vs Joseph Lenti / Kelli Geris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHardik Panchal / Emma Stucki vs Mario Piergallini / Hayley Scroop3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Lucas Gavino / Cheyenne Morrison vs Kevin Collins / Katie Winter6-4, 6-4
2024-10-11vs YTC-Balls DeepLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrevor Morrison / Alisha Nguyen vs Daphne Reilly / Quinn Plant6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSean Holloway / Jennifer Cunnington vs Mary Jacky / Eric Schultheiss6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheyenne Morrison / Ryan Lucas Gavino vs Molly Carlson / Karl Lieberknecht6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Ryan Lucas Gavino
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.86
Alisha Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Arjun Shanker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Hardik Panchal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Roman Gavino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Emma Stucki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Jennifer Cunnington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Sean Holloway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cheyenne Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Trevor Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trevor Morrison + Cheyenne Morrison3843% games+5.3% vs expected
Jennifer Cunnington + Sean Holloway3254% gamesnot enough data
Trevor Morrison + Alisha Nguyen213 matchesnot enough data
Roman Gavino + Jennifer Cunnington123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Lucas Gavino
28W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4
Alisha Nguyen
52W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
3.5
Arjun Shanker
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Hardik Panchal
31W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Roman Gavino
80W–81L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Emma Stucki
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jennifer Cunnington
47W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Sean Holloway
45W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Cheyenne Morrison
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Morrison
35W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.