Teams

Westwood Anthony

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-14vs Woodlake RitterLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Dunstan / SanDee Gammon vs Marcy Kozlowski / Kimberly Ritter1-6, 2-6
2022-06-10vs ACAC CarmanWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Dunstan / SanDee Gammon vs Liesl Delisio / Leigh Gorman6-2, 7-5
2022-06-07vs Raintree FallinLost 01
L#1 DoublesSanDee Gammon / Donna Bearman vs Catherine Fallin / Kimberly Kimball3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-06-05vs RCC SamuelsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Bearman / Rose Yuen vs Geri Samuels / Debra Carter2-6, 0-6
2022-05-31vs HCC CaldwellWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Bearman / Julie Farney vs Kristy Bauer / Cheryl Law6-3, 7-6
2022-05-20vs ACAC RiddleLost 01
L#1 DoublesSanDee Gammon / Donna Bearman vs Nancy Hayes / Lee Moore4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
SanDee Gammon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Donna Bearman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Heather Harker
published 3.5
3.24
Becky Anthony
published 3.5
3.23
Julie Farney
published
3.17
Jessica van Tuyle
published
3.16
Rose Yuen
published
3.13
Meredith Schwartz
published
3.13
Kelly Berry
published
2.94
Barbara Bailey
published 3
Louise O'Connor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica van Tuyle + Julie Farney5452% games+6.5% vs expected
SanDee Gammon + Donna Bearman372751% games+1.7% vs expected
Jessica van Tuyle + SanDee Gammon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
SanDee Gammon
123W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Donna Bearman
137W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Heather Harker
5W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Becky Anthony
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Julie Farney
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jessica van Tuyle
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Rose Yuen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Meredith Schwartz
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kelly Berry
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Barbara Bailey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Louise O'Connor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.