Teams

WCC-Browning

2024 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekday · Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women Weekday

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-30vs YarmoshLost 01
L#3 SinglesAlison Brandt vs Carey Mottet7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-23vs Nilsson - Single ShotWon 10
W#1 SinglesMary Lou Daylor vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-2, 6-0
2024-09-20vs YarmoshSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMary Lou Daylor vs Carey Mottet6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlison Brandt vs Peggah Wilson6-4, 6-3
2024-09-13vs Nilsson - Single ShotWon 10
W#3 SinglesMary Lou Daylor vs Nancy Gatti6-4, 6-4
2024-09-09vs YarmoshLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlison Brandt vs Carolyn Mccarter3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Rachel Hahn
published
3.03
Mary Lou Daylor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.02
2.85
Sarah Browning
published
2.83
Alison Brandt
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Julia Connell
published
2.73
Ann Pawlak
published 3
Nancy Dearment
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Hahn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Mary Lou Daylor
44W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Adelaide Turnbull
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Sarah Browning
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Alison Brandt
40W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.83
Julia Connell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Ann Pawlak
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Nancy Dearment
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.