Teams

Valle Lindo Volleygirls

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesEsther Lopez / Van Stephenson vs Patty Mallery / Joeli Gutfleisch2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNicola Grun vs Jenna Phillips0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Cade / Janet Chandler vs Lucia Shanahan / Nicolette Villa2-6, 1-6
2025-03-16vs Sunset AcesWon 10
W#1 SinglesStacy Ball vs Nora Valentino7-5, 6-1
2025-03-08vs Sunset Hills Love ALLWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Ball / Pamela Wax-Semus vs Kimberly Rozanski / Debbie Tuttle6-3, 7-6
2025-03-02vs Westlake MonarchsLost 01
L#1 SinglesStacy Ball vs Monica Helm4-6, 1-6
2025-02-09vs Royal Court JestersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarolina Britt / Stacy Ball vs Sally Miller / Tracy Bodis6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Carolina Britt
published 3
2.98
Van Stephenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
2.74
Anne Renard
published 3
2.72
Debra Myrent
published 3
2.72
Aimee Stotser
published 3
2.66
Judith Cade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Esther Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Carol Goldreyer
published 3
2.62
Pamela Wax-Semus
published
2.39
Janet Chandler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicola Grun
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Myrent + Anne Renard213 matchesnot enough data
Esther Lopez + Pamela Wax-Semus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolina Britt
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Van Stephenson
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Akshatha Gangadhar
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Anne Renard
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Debra Myrent
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Aimee Stotser
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Judith Cade
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Esther Lopez
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Carol Goldreyer
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Pamela Wax-Semus
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Janet Chandler
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Nicola Grun
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.