Teams

Comstock/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-17vs Ladlam/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmy Coggin / Tricia Morris vs Brooke Riebeling / Kyle McCarthy Murphy6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMindy Cone vs Sara Ludlam4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJelena Sanford / Brittany Fitzgerald vs Mary Alden Brett / Elizabeth Noble6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSarah Mettee vs Laura Woodard6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Baca / Stephanie Mathias vs Stephanie Speller / Lynne Falk4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Mindy Cone
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Dana Latreille
published 3
2.85
Jelena Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Brittany Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Julie Comstock
published
2.62
2.55
Melissa Orum
published
2.53
Stephanie Mathias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Sarah Mettee
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.42
Rebecca Baca
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Amy Coggin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Bryn Harrison
published 2.5
Donna Holt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Stollenwerk + Melissa Orum033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mindy Cone
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Dana Latreille
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jelena Sanford
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brittany Fitzgerald
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Julie Comstock
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Brittany Stollenwerk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
Melissa Orum
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Stephanie Mathias
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Sarah Mettee
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Rebecca Baca
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.42
2.5
Amy Coggin
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Bryn Harrison
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Holt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.