Teams

Net Neutrality

2023 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over Summer · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.71 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-03vs Serving LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Healy / Natilee Festa vs Suzanne Krudys / Giselle Medina6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathryn Codd / Amy Cahoon vs Lucy Hurd / Elise Wirkus5-7, 5-4
2023-05-21vs 40 - LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Ngoc Tran / Gretchen Teel vs Wendy Guo / Pascaline Sangosse3-6, 2-6
2023-05-13vs Serve OnLost 01
L#3 DoublesSharon Sabasteanski / Amy Cahoon vs Gail Douglass / Harriet Nash3-6, 3-5
2023-05-07vs LoVVLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Cahoon / Chelsea Thompson vs Maria Scaler / Christine Ferry4-6, 4-5
2023-05-06vs GamettesLost 02
L#2 DoublesSharon Sabasteanski / Rachel Clenney vs Charlene Collier / Shalita Williams2-6, 3-4
L#3 DoublesAmy Cahoon / Gretchen Teel vs Lucy Wang / Lesley Wellener4-6, 0-6
2023-04-23vs Serving LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathryn Codd / Chelsea Thompson vs Diana Blitz / Lucy Hurd4-6, 5-2
L#1 SinglesHelen Hale vs Ariel Selwyn5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesRachel Clenney / Amy Cahoon vs Suzanne Krudys / Giselle Medina3-6, 6-7
2023-04-15vs Serve OnSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmy Cahoon / Kathryn Codd vs Rosemary McEnery / Suzanne Proctor6-7, 3-3
W#2 SinglesJessica Somers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-08vs GamettesLost 02
L#2 DoublesRachael Smith / Jessica Somers vs Kirah Yen / Alexandra Phillips2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Sabasteanski / Amy Cahoon vs Charlene Collier / Shalita Williams4-6, 2-6
2023-04-01vs LoVVWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Cahoon / Rachel Clenney vs Gillian Moorhead / Evelyn Hockstein1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LoVV64292140358
2Serve On64272349396
3Net Neutrality0993669449

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Natilee Festa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Carolyn Healy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Kathryn Codd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Jessica Somers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.56
Kim Ngoc Tran
published
3.51
Chelsea Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Sharon Sabasteanski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Amy Cahoon
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Helen Hale
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Gretchen Teel
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jennifer Hanna
published
Julie Borror
published
Katie Boehret
published
Rachael Smith
published
Rachel Clenney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Saperstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natilee Festa + Carolyn Healy17360% games+7.2% vs expected
Amy Cahoon + Kim Ngoc Tran044 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Sabasteanski + Amy Cahoon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natilee Festa
39W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Carolyn Healy
49W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
Kathryn Codd
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Jessica Somers
124W–176L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kim Ngoc Tran
10W–20L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Chelsea Thompson
10W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Sharon Sabasteanski
255W–176L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Amy Cahoon
181W–281L career · 12 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Helen Hale
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gretchen Teel
144W–114L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Jennifer Hanna
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Borror
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Boehret
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Smith
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Clenney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Saperstein
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.