Teams

LA - Kiss My Ace

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-13vs LA - Shadow's AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllegra Peelor / Sona Arutyunyan vs Summer Shelton / Rebecca Escandon6-3, 6-3
2021-06-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Tiffany Lee vs Jessica Gottlieb / Frances Murray6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSona Arutyunyan / Morgan Halsey vs Sondra Zionts / Jessica Zionts6-1, 6-1
2021-05-09Won 10
W#1 SinglesSona Arutyunyan vs Nathalie Vergnolle6-4, 6-2
2021-05-01vs LA - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Candice Hung vs Summer Shelton / Rebecca Escandon2-6, 4-6
2021-04-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesSona Arutyunyan vs Jaime Lee6-3, 6-1
2021-04-17vs LA-LLW-Queen Anne-Mala LeeLost 01
L#2 DoublesVilayvanh Shah / Jennifer Campoy vs MINA RICABAR / Amy Thompson3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Sona Arutyunyan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Vilayvanh Shah
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Tiffany Lee
published
3.77
JANE CHUN
published 4
Candice Hung
published 4
3.74
Kelly Moss
published
3.74
Satsuki Yamashita
published
3.54
Becky Leibowitz
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 3.5
Jennifer Campoy
published
Rachel Harbert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vilayvanh Shah + Sona Arutyunyan361557% games+2.1% vs expected
Kelly Moss + Satsuki Yamashita224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sona Arutyunyan
174W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Vilayvanh Shah
194W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
4.11
Tiffany Lee
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.85
4
JANE CHUN
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Candice Hung
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Moss
8W–8L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Satsuki Yamashita
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Becky Leibowitz
40W–26L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.54
Jennifer Campoy
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Harbert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.