Teams

Neely Farm (Cheri Maiorano)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.5 Women (Arrie Lugar)

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-14vs Cherokee Town Club (Beth Rousseau)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesHelen Pond / Pamela Brazell vs Sara Snuggs / Laura MacE6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDiane Cabibi vs Heather Wininger2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Rummel / Maria Lowe vs Katie Chilivis / Jacqueline Flake6-3, 5-7, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCheri Maiorano / Jeanne Ryan vs Beth Rousseau / Ashley Kotkin4-6, 5-7
2025-01-07vs River Glen (Sherrie Shapiro)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesHelen Pond / Pamela Brazell vs Heather Davis / Anne Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne Derderian / Laurie Rummel vs Michelle Carlson / Kim Rutledge4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheri Maiorano / Maria Lowe vs Elizabeth Hayde / Michele Neiland1-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesDiane Cabibi / Donna Capozzoli vs Rita Mohs / Lylian Voss6-2, 2-6, 6-7
2024-12-19vs Chastain (Daniella McGowan)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesPamela Brazell / Helen Pond vs Florencia Ducote / Crystal Noronha0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDiane Cabibi vs Sandra Burnett5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Capozzoli / Kirsten Scott vs Lorie Meyer / Francine Slimmon0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Reeves / Laurie Rummel vs Kelly Upton / Xiurong Kao2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesGayle Brett / Jeanne Derderian vs Patty Peck / Mary Williams2-6, 1-6
2024-12-03vs Dunwoody CC (Suzanne Baisier)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesLaurie Rummel / Leslie Armstrong vs Lollie DeFreese / Debbie Young2-6, 6-1, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHelen Pond vs Christy Clark4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMaria Lowe / Cheri Maiorano vs Kelly Clinch / Caroline Hickey6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonna Capozzoli / Diane Cabibi vs Lauren Bingham / Angie Patnode6-1, 7-5
W#4 DoublesJeanne Derderian / Jeanne Ryan vs Nancy Kaufman / Karen Stroer6-3, 6-2
2024-12-02vs Horseshoe Bend (Yvonne Kenny)*Lost 14
W#1 DoublesMaria Lowe / Helen Pond vs Kathi Blevins / Anne Storey4-6, 7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPamela Brazell vs Liz Zacharias1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaurie Rummel / Jeanne Ryan vs Barbara Gradolf / Pat Price0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Scott / Cheri Maiorano vs Yvonne Kenny / Judith Ross1-6, 7-5, 3-6
L#4 DoublesGayle Brett / Jeanne Derderian vs Sara Goodwin / Melissa Crean0-6, 3-6
2024-11-12vs Sandy Springs (Eve Frist)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesConnie Pope / Pamela Brazell vs Laura Johnson / Clair Archer4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKirsten Scott vs Angie Douglas2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHelen Pond / Leslie Armstrong vs Marla Michalewicz / KARLA AVERY6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Cabibi / Cheri Maiorano vs Beth Sibert / Brenda Maddaleni0-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesJeanne Ryan / Gayle Brett vs Eve Frist / Cathy Driscoll3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Connie Pope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Helen Pond
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Pamela Brazell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.16
Donna Capozzoli
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Diane Cabibi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.99
Kirsten Scott
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.92
Cheri Maiorano
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Amy Reeves
published 3
Gayle Brett
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Derderian
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Laurie Rummel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Maria Lowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Pond + Diane Cabibi4252% games+9.2% vs expected
Helen Pond + Pamela Brazell4450% games+9.1% vs expected
Cheri Maiorano + Maria Lowe2543% games−14.7% vs expected
Jeanne Derderian + Gayle Brett3744% gamesnot enough data
Maria Lowe + Amy Reeves4259% gamesnot enough data
Cheri Maiorano + Diane Cabibi134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Rummel + Pamela Brazell314 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Derderian + Laurie Rummel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Connie Pope
23W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Helen Pond
25W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Pamela Brazell
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Donna Capozzoli
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3
Diane Cabibi
12W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.02
Kirsten Scott
22W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Cheri Maiorano
14W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Amy Reeves
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gayle Brett
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeanne Derderian
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Rummel
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Lowe
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.