Teams

Sarasota/Dancer/40&Over4.5W

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 4.5 W Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-01vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 30
W#1 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Maureen Rasp-Glose6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah McNeill / Janet Sperling vs Ana Areosa / Kerry Distefano6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllyson Hoffman / Jennifer Bright vs Diane DeGurian / Sally Alford6-3, 6-3
2025-02-22vs Plantation PetruccelliSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Sally Alford7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bright / Allyson Hoffman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-15vs Plantation PetruccelliLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Green / Cindy Fancher vs Lynn Deuitch / Beth Costa6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Dancer / Jennifer Peters vs Ann Pfister-Brown / Marjorie Petruccelli4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdriana Garcia / Jennifer Peters vs Kerry Distefano / Lee Bailey6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJanet Sperling vs Maureen Rasp-Glose6-3, 3-2
2025-02-01vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Peters / Jennifer Bright vs Ann Pfister-Brown / Diane DeGurian6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-25vs Plantation PetruccelliSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Sperling / Adriana Garcia vs Beth Costa / Lee Bailey6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Green / Jennifer Peters vs Marjorie Petruccelli / Ann Pfister-Brown6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2025-01-18vs Plantation PetruccelliWon 20
W#1 SinglesCindy Fancher vs Ana Areosa6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJanet Sperling / Kathy McMahon vs Lee Bailey / Beth Costa6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Sarah McNeill
published
4.33
Allyson Hoffman
published 4.5
4.28
Marika Lindholm
published
4.25
Cindy Fancher
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Kelly Dancer
published
4.22
Jennifer Bright
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.06
Jennifer Peters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.05
Kathy McMahon
published
3.94
Amy Lyons
published 4.5
3.84
Adriana Garcia
published 4.5
3.59
Elizabeth Green
published
Janet Sperling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kate Thayer-Rhodes
published
Margaret Petersen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Green + Allyson Hoffman2354% games+6.6% vs expected
Jennifer Bright + Jennifer Peters312152% games−3.2% vs expected
Janet Sperling + Jennifer Peters1437% gamesnot enough data
Kate Thayer-Rhodes + Jennifer Peters4163% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Bright + Janet Sperling213 matchesnot enough data
Janet Sperling + Cindy Fancher123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Green + Adriana Garcia123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy McMahon + Cindy Fancher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah McNeill
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Allyson Hoffman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
Marika Lindholm
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Cindy Fancher
68W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Kelly Dancer
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Jennifer Bright
100W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Jennifer Peters
65W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
Kathy McMahon
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Amy Lyons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Adriana Garcia
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
Elizabeth Green
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Janet Sperling
18W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Thayer-Rhodes
37W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Petersen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.