Teams

TOC.Kumar

2025 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 18 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-08vs TOC.SachanLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Limone / Mahesh Salian vs Ghanshyamsinh Gohil / Kiran Ramaswamy1-6, 1-6
2025-07-28vs MCP.RatliffSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick Jones / Kapil Dukle vs Charles Gowland / Michael Ratliff3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesArun Kumar / Mahesh Salian vs Francisco Burbano / Steven Cataldo6-2, 3-3
2025-07-27vs TOC.YangLost 02
L#1 DoublesKapil Dukle / Patrick Jones vs Ranjith Dasaradhi / Stephen Holmes2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMahesh Salian / Nathan Naramor vs Leon LI / Chaitawat Sirisereewan0-6, 1-6
2025-07-24vs LOCH.ReynoldsLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Jones / Kapil Dukle vs Jeff Cockayne / Mark Baldwin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Naramor / Mahesh Salian vs Kyle Reynolds / Russell Lewis0-6, 1-6
2025-07-14vs TOC.SachanLost 01
L#2 DoublesArun Kumar / Mahesh Salian vs Nitni Agrawal / Anjaneya Tiwari3-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs LOCH.ReynoldsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Jones / Kapil Dukle vs Kyle Reynolds / Jeff Cockayne2-6, 4-6
2025-06-05vs MCP.RatliffLost 01
L#1 DoublesKapil Dukle / Arun Kumar vs Charles Gowland / Michael Ratliff6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-22vs TOC.YangWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Limone / Patrick Jones vs Arthur Tang / Jaydeep Punde6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGuru Mallesh / Digvijay Singh vs XINGZHOU LI / Leon LI7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSamir Parikh / Syamkiran Yeduvaka vs Yuxu Yang / Vinay Chandra6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 18 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kapil Dukle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Mahesh Salian
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Syamkiran Yeduvaka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Digvijay Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Nathan Naramor
published
Guru Mallesh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Limone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samir Parikh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kapil Dukle
23W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Mahesh Salian
66W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Syamkiran Yeduvaka
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Digvijay Singh
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Naramor
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Guru Mallesh
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Limone
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Samir Parikh
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.