Teams

BHSC Gone Country-Johnson

2024 Charlottesville Tri-Level 18 & Over · Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-20vs Farmington-WorthLost 01
L#1 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Grace Bartini vs Anne Barger / Scout Crimmins1-6, 3-6
2024-08-13vs Forest Lakes-FurlowLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Park / Jannemieke Keener vs Pamela Jupin / Lauren Thraves2-6, 2-6
2024-07-30vs BHSC-BlemkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Pascale Hapgood vs Ellen Hayes / Allison Ewing3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Natasha Heller
published
2.85
Maritza Johnson
published
2.85
Susan Park
published
2.83
Jannemieke Keener
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Gretchen Masselli
published
2.64
Sara Wist
published
2.60
Jessicah Collins
published
2.38
Kathryn Harris
published
2.27
Sherry Lake
published
2.03
Abigail Cook Dommer
published 2.5
Grace Bartini
published
Pascale Hapgood
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natasha Heller
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Maritza Johnson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Susan Park
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Sara Wist
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Jessicah Collins
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.60
Kathryn Harris
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%79%21%
2.38
Sherry Lake
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Abigail Cook Dommer
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Grace Bartini
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Pascale Hapgood
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.