Teams

11 Stephens Resurgence at MAC

2024 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekend Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-14vs 6 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Young / Erich Yost vs Laurent Beausergent / Gabriel Ghita6-1, 6-4
2024-06-30vs 1 ACAC CipollaWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Premock / Erich Yost vs Ryland Dennis / Tim Kasten6-4, 6-4
2024-06-23vs 7 Ridgetop ChiffrillerWon 10
W#1 DoublesErich Yost / Thomas Young vs John Crawford / Denny Nelson6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekend Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Charlie Wilson
published 4
3.82
Charles Samson
published 4
Alex Balas
published 4
3.44
Roger Wisor
published
3.42
Marc Elim
published
3.40
Erich Yost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
John Ward
published
3.20
Shawn Harwood
published
3.17
Gregory Ewald
published 3.5
3.13
Michael Huband
published
3.08
YOUNG CHOE
published
3.01
Brian Premock
published 3.5
Michael Steele
published
Olivier Houpert
published
Tom Rider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Ewald + Marc Elim314 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Ewald + Brian Premock224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Wilson
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.88
4
Charles Samson
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Alex Balas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Wisor
38W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
Marc Elim
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Erich Yost
142W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
John Ward
19W–25L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
Shawn Harwood
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Gregory Ewald
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
Michael Huband
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
YOUNG CHOE
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Brian Premock
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Michael Steele
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Olivier Houpert
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.