Teams

Play2Win

Tri-Level · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs Glen Creek - Unfinished BusinessLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Morrisard / Samantha Spagnola vs Teresa Benjamin / Vicki Donne3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Flanders / Jennifer Donnelly vs Sarah Albaugh / Dawn Beighey0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristin Bummer / Ronni Pelle vs Tish Gordon / Jill Mcshane6-0, 6-4
2026-08-22vs AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegha Khelgi / Samantha Spagnola vs Kelly Wojcik / Lisa Rios6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnamarie Lang / Amy Flanders vs Sara Hassan / Kathleen Durst5-7, 1-4
W#3 DoublesTerri Billhimer / Kate Sheehan vs Diane Costa / Denise Paredes4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-15vs Glen Creek Level UpWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Saad / Arla Baker vs Jennifer Yocca / Meredith Irwin7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnnamarie Lang / Christine Siket vs Heather Jamison / Billie Jo Johnston6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeverly Pietrandrea / Kristine Santerini vs Christine Ardolino / Jennifer Zofchak4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aces1021224
2Alpha1030227
3Play2Win000000
4Glen Creek - Unfinished Business0112426
5Glen Creek Level Up0103629

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Lauren Diulus
published
3.78
Jessica Tracey
published
3.68
Andrea Morrisard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Arla Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Michelle Saad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Megha Khelgi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Annamarie Lang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Samantha Spagnola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Amy Flanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Terri Billhimer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Christine Siket
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Elisa DiMeo
published 3.5
3.15
Christin Bummer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Qing Deng
published
3.09
Julie Catanese
published
3.02
Melanie Scott
published
2.96
Ronni Pelle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Kate Sheehan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Beverly Pietrandrea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kristine Santerini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Donnelly
published
Jennifer Kelly
published
Patty Diulus-Myers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Pietrandrea + Julie Catanese12953% games+6.6% vs expected
Arla Baker + Lauren Diulus8157% games+5.3% vs expected
Arla Baker + Michelle Saad3742% games−4.1% vs expected
Ronni Pelle + Christin Bummer404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Flanders + Arla Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Terri Billhimer + Christin Bummer123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Diulus + Andrea Morrisard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Diulus
85W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Jessica Tracey
48W–30L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Andrea Morrisard
16W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Arla Baker
185W–125L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Michelle Saad
130W–161L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Megha Khelgi
42W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
3.5
Annamarie Lang
29W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
Samantha Spagnola
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Amy Flanders
36W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Terri Billhimer
31W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.29
3.5
Christine Siket
40W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Elisa DiMeo
17W–7L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Christin Bummer
69W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
Qing Deng
8W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Julie Catanese
62W–83L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Melanie Scott
13W–25L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Ronni Pelle
32W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kate Sheehan
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Beverly Pietrandrea
82W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Kristine Santerini
27W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Jennifer Donnelly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Kelly
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patty Diulus-Myers
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.