Teams

MTC - Huettemann

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Mobile · 18 & Over 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-21vs MO - SabolLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Negus / Hartley Winter vs Shannon Barnes / Kelsi Maulding2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBeck Zarzour / Kelly Hulak vs Kim Sedergran / Geri Gautney1-6, 4-6
2026-03-14vs MO - SabolWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Brandon Scott / Hartley Winter vs Shannon Barnes / Kelsi Maulding6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJordan Kennedy / Megan Pennington vs Misty Sabol / Jill Taylor-Phillips6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlice Johnson / Devon Timmerman vs Geri Gautney / Stephanie Pansch3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-07vs MO - SabolSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Brandon Scott / Courtney Negus vs Salmedina Alic / Stephanie Sandefur6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAlice Johnson / Mary Finkbohner vs Kim Sedergran / Stephanie Pansch4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-28vs MO - SabolLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Brandon Scott / Kristen Roberts vs Shannon Barnes / Kelsi Maulding6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Pennington / Leigh Crowley vs Misty Sabol / Jennifer Walsh3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Johnson / Mary Finkbohner vs Emily Ackerman / Stephanie Pansch3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MTC - Huettemann317511101
2MTC - Wruck/Nguyen226614111
3MTC - Cabral135715119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mary Brandon Scott
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Courtney Negus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Hartley Winter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Megan Pennington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Leigh Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Devon Timmerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Beck Zarzour
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Kelly Hulak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Finkbohner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Negus + Mary Brandon Scott4161% games+7.5% vs expected
Megan Pennington + Kelly Hulak3248% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Brandon Scott
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Courtney Negus
20W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Hartley Winter
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Megan Pennington
36W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.70
Leigh Crowley
23W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
2.5
Devon Timmerman
14W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Beck Zarzour
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Kelly Hulak
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Mary Finkbohner
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.