Teams

LCTA55/Crivella/Maybank

Other Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Adult · 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-24vs LCTA55/Karika/legendOaksWon 10
W#1 DoublesArt Harper / Michelle Crivella vs Laura Christiansen / Bryan Hatmaker6-3, 7-6
2023-06-10vs LCTA55/Cechak/LTPDIWon 10
W#1 DoublesArt Harper / Adrienne Eischeid vs Tony Colizzi / Deborah McFann6-0, 6-3
2023-06-03vs LCTA55/Russo/Seabrook Island ClubWon 10
W#2 DoublesArt Harper / Rona Cushman vs Kim Stadelman / Christopher Ryan6-3, 6-1
2023-05-20vs LCTA55/Hubbard/LTP-DIWon 10
W#2 DoublesArt Harper / Adrienne Eischeid vs Peter Finger / Christina Baxter6-4, 6-0
2023-05-06vs LCTA55/Linker/MPRWon 10
W#2 DoublesArt Harper / Adrienne Eischeid vs Terry Linker / Dennis Rossello6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Kelli Ransone
published
3.57
Tom Cunneff
published
3.54
3.50
Art Harper
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.49
Greg Garvan
published
3.44
Michelle Crivella
published
3.40
William Keiper
published
3.34
Adrienne Eischeid
published 3.5
3.03
Mark Laskowski
published
3.02
Margaret Dawson
published
2.93
Michelle Copley
published
2.90
Warren Weniger
published
James Holland
published
Kim Cole
published
Linder Laffitte
published
Loretta Laquara
published
Michael Laquara
published
Rona Cushman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Art Harper + Adrienne Eischeid4257% games−1.0% vs expected
Tom Cunneff + Linder Laffitte2438% gamesnot enough data
Michael Laquara + Loretta Laquara303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Ransone
28W–41L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Tom Cunneff
27W–34L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Barbara Silveston
44W–22L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Art Harper
207W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Greg Garvan
33W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Michelle Crivella
85W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
William Keiper
62W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Adrienne Eischeid
49W–50L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Mark Laskowski
13W–48L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Margaret Dawson
41W–28L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Michelle Copley
34W–44L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Warren Weniger
11W–37L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
James Holland
28W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Cole
18W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linder Laffitte
107W–87L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Loretta Laquara
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Laquara
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rona Cushman
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.