Teams

Laurel Park (Brian Wierzbowski)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Regular Levels · 3.5 Men (Sean Vergara)

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-01-24vs Harrison (Leroy Emkin)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesCameron Lancaster / Lucas Hatfield vs Jeff Olson / Douglas Shonrock7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesZack Schlosser vs Mark Gerry3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrett Martin / Brian Wierzbowski vs Michael Smith / James Pfaffenberger6-1, 6-0
2026-01-17vs Harrison (Sunny Sequeira)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesJoel Thacker / Brian Wierzbowski vs Ashokkumar Shanmugam / Poornachandra Bhramhanapalli6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMatthew McMahon / Nguyen Nguyen vs Kevin Smith / Chaitanya Gudala3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBlake Walker / Cameron Lancaster vs Mathew Varghese / Dharmendra Desai4-6, 7-5, 6-3
2026-01-15vs USTA Atlanta/Osvaldo SanchezLost 04
L#1 DoublesLucas Hatfield / Brian Wierzbowski vs Jason Reichel / Nicholas Milush3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlex Nix vs Jason Black3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNguyen Nguyen vs Leonardo Gonzalez3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBlake Walker / Matthew McMahon vs Clarence Holmes / Matthew Maier2-6, 6-7
2025-12-13vs Harrison TC (Alex Hicks)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesZack Schlosser / Joel Thacker vs Sean Binette / Chris Lozada1-6, 6-1, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNguyen Nguyen vs Curtis Umstead6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Wierzbowski / Lucas Hatfield vs Arpit Bhoti / Ben Ramsey0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAlex Nix vs Dominic Pedone6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBlake Walker / Cameron Lancaster vs Bobby Lee / Matt Joines1-6, 2-6
2025-12-06vs Terrell Mill (Parker Flynn)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesLucas Hatfield / Joel Thacker vs Ed Logan / Michael Mekas6-3, 6-7, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlex Nix vs Parker Flynn4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesZack Schlosser / Brian Wierzbowski vs Jak Kroll / Charles Armstrong6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Martin / Brett Martin vs Harrison Hibberd / Buddy Jones6-2, 6-3
2025-11-22vs Northampton (Brandon Drew)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesLucas Hatfield / Brian Wierzbowski vs Michael Tatham / Dave McAninch2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNguyen Nguyen vs Troy Kubes6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBlake Walker / Cameron Lancaster vs Parminder Saini / Mark Higgins4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew McMahon vs Alan Aumann3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Martin / Ben Barfield vs Marc Gold / Gerard Delaney1-6, 1-6
2025-11-15vs Browns Farm (Rob Toy)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Wierzbowski / Lucas Hatfield vs Josh Davis / Donald White7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAlex Nix vs Mark Nelson6-7, 6-4, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew McMahon / Blake Walker vs William Boyle / Sean Reynolds6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesZack Schlosser / Nguyen Nguyen vs Rob Toy / Bob Hobbs6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men (Sean Vergara) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Alex Nix
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.43
Cameron Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Brian Wierzbowski
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.35
Zack Schlosser
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.31
Lucas Hatfield
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Joel Thacker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ben Barfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Nguyen Nguyen
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.19
Matthew McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Blake Walker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.82
Brett Martin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Wierzbowski + Lucas Hatfield4549% games−5.7% vs expected
Brian Wierzbowski + Brett Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Cameron Lancaster + Blake Walker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Nix
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Cameron Lancaster
4W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Brian Wierzbowski
13W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Zack Schlosser
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Lucas Hatfield
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Joel Thacker
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ben Barfield
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nguyen Nguyen
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
Matthew McMahon
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Blake Walker
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Brett Martin
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.