Teams

MPTC - Love All

**2025 Team Combo · Ladies 9.5

10 players · average NTRP 4.70 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesNeha Shaw / Joyce Tiong vs Hannah Watson / Alex Kornajcik2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAbby Dennett / Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Crystal Fain / Kimberly Elliott7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Joy / Linnie Ford vs Laura Fandry / Marina Vigil Celorio6-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesNeha Shaw / Cecilia Tetlow vs Lauren Gutterman / Alex Kornajcik1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Dennett / Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Marissa Valentine-King / Elizabeth Crider3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Stryker / Linnie Ford vs Laura Fandry / Kimberly Elliott1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.67
Neha Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.54
Bianca Posada
published 5
4.27
Abby Dennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.15
Cynthia Blust
published 4.5
4.11
Linnie Ford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Cecilia Tetlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Melissa Stryker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Joyce Tiong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Amanda Joy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.88
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Dennett + Cecilia Tetlow3457% games+25.8% vs expected
Cecilia Tetlow + Amanda Joy5555% games+12.5% vs expected
Neha Shaw + Abby Dennett17362% games+10.1% vs expected
Abby Dennett + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4253% games+9.7% vs expected
Cynthia Blust + Linnie Ford242152% games+4.6% vs expected
Joyce Tiong + Melissa Stryker5068% games+4.3% vs expected
Neha Shaw + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4154% games−0.4% vs expected
Joyce Tiong + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4150% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neha Shaw
36W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Bianca Posada
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.54
5
Abby Dennett
40W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.27
4.5
Cynthia Blust
42W–31L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Linnie Ford
65W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.11
4.5
Cecilia Tetlow
28W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Melissa Stryker
72W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.02
Joyce Tiong
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Amanda Joy
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
44W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.