Teams

Strawhecker

2026 NE Adult 55&Over · 8.0 Adult Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-22vs TongLost 12
L#1 DoublesJodi Nelson / Debra Adams vs Donna Wyse / Robyn Kleidosty4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPolly ReQua / Karen Jennings vs Karen Andresen / Wei Tong2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTami Bourland / Susan Nielsen vs Kelli Fitzgerald Draper / Iona Pavlik6-1, 6-2
2026-06-20vs NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Jennings / Polly ReQua vs Teri Barnard / Sandra Zebrowski1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChrista Pope / Jodi Nelson vs Julia Elkin / Cathy Fluckey3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTami Bourland / Susan Nielsen vs Victoria Leigh Glesmann / Kay Merkel6-2, 6-2
2026-06-19vs ReinersWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Blumel / Jenny Waltemath vs Tammy Tegler / Lisa Wilkinson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTerri Dunlap / Polly ReQua vs Deb Bitzer / Myong Choi6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-18vs HolbrookWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Blumel / Jenny Waltemath vs Terri Fuxa / Denise Johnson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Adams / Jodi Nelson vs Clara Hames / Fae Sterba7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTami Bourland / Susan Nielsen vs Denise Hazelrigg / Sarah McGowan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-30vs NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebra Adams / Lisa Thomas vs Jill Irwin / Beth Stiles2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Blumel / Jane Strawhecker vs Teri Barnard / Sandra Zebrowski2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Jennings / Polly ReQua vs Kim Spurgeon / Mary Lou Winquest6-1, 6-4
2026-05-16vs ReinersWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Blumel / Jenny Waltemath vs Lisa Wilkinson / Anne Main6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChrista Pope / Jodi Nelson vs Karen Reiners / Mary Callahan6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Adams / Polly ReQua vs Catherine Porath / Tammy Tegler6-0, 7-6
2026-05-14vs HolbrookWon 30
W#1 DoublesTami Bourland / Susan Nielsen vs Denise Hazelrigg / Sarah McGowan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Adams / Jane Strawhecker vs Allison Arntz / Clara Hames6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTerri Dunlap / Polly ReQua vs Tammie Kennedy / Denise Johnson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs TongLost 02
L#1 DoublesChrista Pope / Jodi Nelson vs Donna Wyse / Robyn Kleidosty3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Blumel / Jenny Waltemath vs Karen Andresen / Michelle Muirhead4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Winquest/55&Over8.0W7118614146
2Strawhecker4415921191
3Holbrook1761839254
4Reiners1742042277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Christa Pope
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jenny Waltemath
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Tami Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Debra Adams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Susan Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.42
Heather Blumel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.42
Polly ReQua
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.36
Jodi Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Jane Strawhecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Terri Dunlap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Jennings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Adams + Tami Bourland27961% games+5.3% vs expected
Jenny Waltemath + Heather Blumel4262% gamesnot enough data
Terri Dunlap + Polly ReQua314 matchesnot enough data
Tami Bourland + Susan Nielsen314 matchesnot enough data
Terri Dunlap + Heather Blumel213 matchesnot enough data
Jodi Nelson + Christa Pope123 matchesnot enough data
Polly ReQua + Jane Strawhecker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christa Pope
61W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Jenny Waltemath
26W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Tami Bourland
157W–121L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.67
4
Debra Adams
130W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Susan Nielsen
29W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Heather Blumel
147W–158L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Polly ReQua
28W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Jodi Nelson
119W–100L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Jane Strawhecker
66W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Terri Dunlap
73W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Karen Jennings
15W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.