Teams

SFV - The 300's MS

2024 Team Singles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Men 4.0 Singles

8 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-23vs SFV - The Pickleball RejectsLost 03
L#1 SinglesDavid Soucy vs Raphael Laigneau2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrad Lomax vs Richard Ortiz-Reyes6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesFrederick Greene vs Eric Stang3-6, 2-6
2024-11-02vs SFV - Glory DaysLost 01
L#2 SinglesShimon Nofar vs Mrinmoy Das3-6, 2-6
2024-10-27Lost 01
L#1 SinglesShimon Nofar vs Eric Harris2-6, 1-6
2024-10-20vs SFV - The Pickleball RejectsLost 12
W#1 SinglesNathan Waxer vs Giacomo Picasso6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFrederick Greene vs Sebastian HEINRICH1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesChris Gennusa vs Raphael Laigneau6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesShimon Nofar vs Philip Miller1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Men 4.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Nathan Waxer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.86
Shimon Nofar
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.85
Eric Schaefer
published 4
3.84
Brad Lomax
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Chris Gennusa
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
David Soucy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.25
Frederick Greene
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Lomax + Eric Schaefer4163% games+14.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nathan Waxer
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
4
Shimon Nofar
217W–98L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Eric Schaefer
20W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Brad Lomax
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Chris Gennusa
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
David Soucy
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Frederick Greene
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.