Teams

Roberts, Tiffany

2022 Adult 40 & Over Daytime League 3.0 - 4.5 · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-04-01vs Madison, RaquelLost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela Protzman / Maribeth Colombo vs Michelle Anderson / Shanna Loyd3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Hare vs Maria Hedrick6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim O'Brien / Pam Thompson vs Phyllis Norman / Courtney Root4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristy Gudenkauf / Pamela Baker vs Tasha Evatt / Kimberly Glenn6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-25vs Luchtel, MaryAnnSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Kopulos / Kim Kosic vs Susan Geick / Kelly Barnickel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSherrie Propeck / Christy Gudenkauf vs Mary Thornton / Marcia Moroney2-6, 5-7
2022-03-11vs Heurtin, KristinLost 13
W#1 DoublesKim O'Brien / Pam Thompson vs Heidi Hoggatt / Susan Thorne-Thomsen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngie Harmon vs Amanda Miller5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Roberts / Kim Kosic vs Connie Banning / Maureen Goetz6-7, 4-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Dunmire / Karen Kopulos vs Candace Asbell / Sara Lester5-7, 4-6
2022-03-04vs Holsinger, JodySplit 22
L#1 DoublesPam Thompson / Jennifer Hare vs Jody Holsinger / Sara Armer4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesPamela Protzman vs Marianne Jones6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Dunmire / Tiffany Roberts vs Jill Ackerman / Tamara Hutcheson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristy Gudenkauf / Pamela Baker vs Ann Crampton / Julie Kehrwald6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-02-25vs Beckley, RobynWon 31
W#1 DoublesPamela Protzman / Karen Kopulos vs Marianela Ramirez / Hilary Petersen7-5, 5-3
W#1 SinglesKatherine Markes vs Tiffany Taylor7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim Dunmire / Maribeth Colombo vs Jennifer Eckert / Amy Merritt1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSherrie Propeck / Tiffany Roberts vs Veronica Legaz / Katie Trenkle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-18vs Knox, RuthWon 40
W#1 DoublesPam Thompson / Tiffany Roberts vs Natalie Austin / Tricia Boushka6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBarbi Richards vs Susan Murphy6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Markes / Kim Kosic vs Jenifer Lund / Linda Shinn6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristy Gudenkauf / Angie Harmon vs Ruth Knox / Andrea Root0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-11vs Wedel NancyLost 04
L#1 DoublesMaribeth Colombo / Kim O'Brien vs Maki True / Laurie Bowman2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Fairman vs Vanessa Watkins2-6, 5-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Kopulos / Kim Dunmire vs Tina Kempf / Nancy Wedel3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPam Cowan / Katherine Markes vs Julie Tushaus / Loras Heck7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-02-04vs Peck, MandyLost 04
L#1 DoublesTiffany Roberts / Pamela Protzman vs Brooke Indiveri / Christine Schwermann6-7, 5-5
L#1 SinglesKaren Kopulos vs Nancy Spielbusch1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeon Rasmuson / Christy Gudenkauf vs Deb Danaher / Jacque Griffey0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPam Cowan / Kim Dunmire vs Keri Evans / Becky Mehrmann1-6, 2-6
2022-01-28vs Bruner, KatherineLost 13
L#1 DoublesMaribeth Colombo / Pam Thompson vs Beth Madden / Amy Hart3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSherrie Propeck vs Allison Waters6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKim O'Brien / Pamela Protzman vs Bree Moseley / Laura Chisholm6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeon Rasmuson / Barbi Richards vs Jane Metz / Amy McCarthy1-6, 2-6
2022-01-21vs Johnson, HeatherLost 13
W#1 DoublesKim Kosic / Kim O'Brien vs Lisa Cummings / Chan Townsend4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAngie Harmon vs Ashlie Staats1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSherrie Propeck / Christy Gudenkauf vs Lauren Johnson / Melodi Calvert6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Fairman / Pam Cowan vs Wendy Leiker / Allyson Braun0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Katherine Markes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Kim O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.73
Kim Kosic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Pamela Protzman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.47
Sherrie Propeck
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Pam Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Barbi Richards
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Monica Fairman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Karen Kopulos
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.20
Kim Dunmire
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Angie Harmon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Christy Gudenkauf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Deon Rasmuson
published
Jennifer Hare
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Maribeth Colombo
published
Pam Cowan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Pamela Baker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Tiffany Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherrie Propeck + Katherine Markes6657% games+10.9% vs expected
Tiffany Roberts + Kim O'Brien4251% games+8.0% vs expected
Tiffany Roberts + Kim Kosic3651% games+6.8% vs expected
Tiffany Roberts + Karen Kopulos61049% games+6.5% vs expected
Barbi Richards + Katherine Markes2550% games+6.4% vs expected
Kim O'Brien + Karen Kopulos4444% games+6.4% vs expected
Christy Gudenkauf + Angie Harmon4155% games+6.3% vs expected
Katherine Markes + Kim Kosic12355% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Markes
86W–80L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Kim O'Brien
80W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Kim Kosic
84W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Pamela Protzman
78W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Sherrie Propeck
52W–59L career · 10 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
Pam Thompson
45W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Barbi Richards
71W–103L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Monica Fairman
101W–101L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Karen Kopulos
80W–90L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Kim Dunmire
25W–19L career · 10 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Angie Harmon
52W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Christy Gudenkauf
85W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Deon Rasmuson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Hare
5W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maribeth Colombo
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Cowan
28W–66L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Baker
17W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tiffany Roberts
32W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.