Teams

WW-Henry

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-04vs SAL-BaderLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Mark Schwartz vs David Voth / Suzanne Spiller3-6, 3-6
2023-02-26vs CCV-RahalLost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Oatts / Todd Prince vs William Krusen / Beth Robbins3-6, 4-6
2023-02-18vs MAC-WilliamsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Byron Balkin vs Heather Barefoot / Konstantin Dombrovskiy6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBecky Oatts / Robert Quinn vs Carol Gregory / Todd Williams3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-01-28vs RAIN-SinsabaughWon 10
W#3 DoublesBecky Oatts / Kevin Calhoun vs Brett Sinsabaugh / April Kim7-6, 6-0
2023-01-21vs ACAC-ChandlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Robert Quinn vs Majd Babik / Joanna Pfluger3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Wright Henry / Byron Balkin vs Diego Marti Vertiz / Sonya Carman6-3, 6-3
2023-01-15vs WW-MillerWon 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Calhoun / Becky Oatts vs Christina Shifflett / Michael Kord6-4, 6-3
2023-01-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Wycinsky / Robert Quinn vs Nina Sjogren / Simon Sjogren4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.82
Clara Laing
published 5
4.42
Kevin Calhoun
published
4.34
Robert Quinn
published
Anna Shea
published 4.5
4.22
Richard Godsey
published
4.20
Elizabeth Kelly
published
4.17
Todd Prince
published
4.11
Mark Schwartz
published
4.05
Michelle Wycinsky
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Becky Oatts
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.75
Erik Wright
published
3.68
Lauren Jones
published
3.51
Ashley Wright Henry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Raymond Kanyo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.82
Kevin Calhoun
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
4.42
Robert Quinn
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
Todd Prince
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
4.17
Mark Schwartz
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Michelle Wycinsky
120W–74L career · 8 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Becky Oatts
57W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.98
Erik Wright
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
3.75
Lauren Jones
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Ashley Wright Henry
47W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
Raymond Kanyo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.