Teams

Guy/Tex

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 2.5,4.5,5.0 · 5.0 Men Local League at State

8 players · average NTRP 4.88 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs Makris/LR/CCLRWon 21
W#1 DoublesCole Guy / Casey Garretson vs John Makris / Grant Jones7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAustin Crawford vs Jesse Ponwith1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Thomson / Caden Highfill vs Aaron Hudson / Raul Bermudez2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-18vs Nosari/MtnHm/LR&FWon 21
L#1 DoublesCasey Garretson / Samuel Moore vs Chris Nosari / Andrew Conover6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJames Thomson vs Conner Lloyd6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTrent Brandon / Jake Bridges vs Otto Fry / Bradford Phelps6-2, 6-1
2025-05-17vs Makris/LR/CCLRWon 30
W#1 DoublesCole Guy / James Thomson vs Jesse Ponwith / Raul Bermudez6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSamuel Moore vs John Makris6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAustin Crawford / Trent Brandon vs Grant Jones / Aaron Hudson6-3, 6-1
2025-05-17vs Nosari/MtnHm/LR&FWon 30
W#1 DoublesCole Guy / Austin Crawford vs Bradford Phelps / Kord Stuffelbeam6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCaden Highfill vs Kevin Praphan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTrent Brandon / Jake Bridges vs Conner Lloyd / Chris Nosari6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men Local League at State have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Cole Guy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.81
Jake Bridges
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Austin Crawford
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
Casey Garretson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.40
Trent Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Caden Highfill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
James Thomson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Samuel Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jake Bridges + Trent Brandon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cole Guy
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.96
Jake Bridges
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Austin Crawford
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Casey Garretson
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trent Brandon
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.40
4.5
Caden Highfill
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Thomson
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Moore
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.