Teams

CTC Curry Combo

Cherokee Fall ('25) - Southern Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Businesss Women (Monday night)

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-29vs Woodmont HottiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesTiffany Simpson / Jennifer Luker vs Summer Bishop / Jaime Schultz6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTeresa Keel / Martina Negron vs Annamarie Vasiloff / Renee Barrineau6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Vorhies / Barbara Hart vs Courtney Nichols / Kathleen Morris6-1, 6-4
2025-09-08vs Woodmont HottiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusie Ivy / Billi Jo Wright vs Stacee Sylvester / Lauren Huff6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wilkins / Chinny Law vs Andrea Lewandowski / Kathleen Morris6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBarbara Hart / Martina Negron vs Julie Pennington / Susan Nash6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Businesss Women (Monday night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jennifer Vorhies
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Tiffany Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Susie Ivy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Chinny Law
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Jennifer Luker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Martina Negron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Teresa Keel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Billi Jo Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Barbara Wilkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Barbara Hart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Wilkins + Jennifer Luker8174% games+18.1% vs expected
Chinny Law + Teresa Keel3251% games+1.9% vs expected
Tiffany Simpson + Martina Negron5359% gamesnot enough data
Susie Ivy + Billi Jo Wright3255% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Keel + Martina Negron4160% gamesnot enough data
Susie Ivy + Tiffany Simpson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Vorhies
103W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Tiffany Simpson
53W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Susie Ivy
33W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Chinny Law
19W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Jennifer Luker
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
Martina Negron
25W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Teresa Keel
45W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Billi Jo Wright
39W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Barbara Wilkins
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Barbara Hart
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.