Teams

TOCVeerappan

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-11vs TOC.JavalkarLost 01
L#1 DoublesJackson Cabell / Gaurav Luther vs Grant McGrew / Vance Jennings2-6, 4-6
2024-06-04vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesGaurav Luther / Jackson Cabell vs Jermaine Byrd / Brett Eckles3-6, 4-6
2024-05-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJackson Cabell / Nate Logan vs Samuel Lee / Henry Lee2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Gaurav Luther
published
4.13
Praveen Krishnamurthy
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.00
Rahul Narang
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.87
Jackson Cabell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Abhi Bhirud
published 4.5
3.77
Madhusudhanarao Nelapati
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Ramana Sodem
published
3.74
Vinay Savanth Repudi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Atul Mehendale
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Bharath Dheekonda
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rahul Narang + Praveen Krishnamurthy852758% games+4.1% vs expected
Atul Mehendale + Rahul Narang3245% gamesnot enough data
Bharath Dheekonda + Vinay Savanth Repudi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gaurav Luther
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
4.5
Praveen Krishnamurthy
239W–127L career · 9 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Rahul Narang
295W–125L career · type A · 10 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Jackson Cabell
44W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
4.5
Abhi Bhirud
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Madhusudhanarao Nelapati
58W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Ramana Sodem
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Vinay Savanth Repudi
16W–17L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Atul Mehendale
58W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Bharath Dheekonda
69W–55L career · type A · 10 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.